A- de 2021
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo
✓Claimant Edison Pablo Zarate Y Otros
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por falta de legitimación
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recusaciones formuladas en contra del magistrado Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar y de la Procuradora General de la Nación.
Encontró la Corte que las recusaciones son manifiestamente impertinentes, pues quienes las invocan no tienen la condición de intervinientes dentro del presente trámite.
Con fundamento en lo anterior, se RECHAZAN por falta de legitimación.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR, por falta de legitimacion, la recusacion formulada por Edison Pablo Zarate, Martha Camila Paez, Andres Fabian Moreno y Delio Camilo Zuniga contra el magistrado Jorge Enrique Ibanez Najar y la Procuradora General de la Nacion.
- Segundo. Contra este auto no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.